![]() |
|
|
The Assembly of The Elder Troth would like to welcome you to our website. Please click on the links to the left to enter the relevant area of our site. From the Introduction to "The Elder Edda and Early Forms of the Epic" by Elezar Meletinsky, Translated by Kenneth H. Ober. Studies in Western Literature and Civilization Volume VI. Edizioni Parnaso - Trieste - 1998. Until the 1870's the study of the Elder Edda and other monuments of Old Germanic poetry was dominated by Romantic notions concerning the extreme antiquity and lack of sophistication of all these monuments: they were looked on as directly embodying the "folk spirit". The individual lays of the Elder Edda, as well as the Hildebrandsleid, Beowulf, and others were regarded as weakly differentiated; they all seemed to be basically the fruit of a common Germanic culture, a common folk culture. The heroic themes were for the most part treated symbolically and interpreted (especially the legend of Sigfrid-Sigurdur) in the spirit of celestial (solar, meteorological) mythology, while the real mythological lays were compared with the Rigveda and the Avesta, and were represented as a fragment of common Indo-European mythology. The brevity of the lays was considered as additional proof of their antiquity, and an extended epos of the Nibelungenlied type was thought to be the result of the mechanical combining or editorial compilation of a number of short songs. The Romantic trend, the initiators of which were Friedrich von Schlegel, Jacob Grimm, Ludwig Uhland, and other famous figures of the German Romantic movement laid the foundation for a scholarly investigation of the Germanic epos, in spite of its limited historic view, "mythologism," and its mysticized conception of folk character. The outstanding works of Karl Müllenhoff (which still have not lost their significance), and more particularly the brilliant monograph of Richard M. Meyer concerning the form of the Germanic epos (1889) are also associated with this school. Meyer succeeded in singling out and describing in great detail numerous common stable features of the Germanic epos, relying largely on the texts of the Elder Edda. In Germany and the Scandinavian
countries during the last decades of the nineteenth century, positivist
reaction against Romantic syncretism - the lack of differentiation between
the Scandinavian and the Common Germanic, between the ancient and the
late, between the literary and the folkloric, between the original and
the borrowed, and between the mythological and the ...The significance of folklore
was acknowledged less and less, and the ancient lays were studied with
the methods of modern textual criticism, with the detection of a series
of authorial redactions. Similar motifs and stylistic turns of speech
in different lays began to be regarded, in ...In contemporary Scandinavian
studies there predominates the interpretation of the Eddic lays as purely
literary works which took form in Iceland from the ninth to the thirteenth
centuries partly on the models of songs brought over from the continent.
Scandinavian innovations are In every possible way, the traces of the influence of skaldic poetry, the fantastic sagas, and even the medieval ballads are stressed. In particular, all distinct elements of folkloric style are explained by the influence of the ballads. Thus, for example, Þrymskviða, formerly considered one of the oldest (with which judgment, it would seem, both its archaic mythological theme and the folkloric nature of its style accord), began to be regarded as one of the latest, and Peter Hallberg has even expressed the supposition that it was composed by Snorri Sturlusson. These tendencies, evident in many of the most recent investigations, were distinctly reflected in the extensive compendium on the history of Scandinavian literature by the great Dutch Germanist, Jan de Vries. It is characteristic that the Elder Edda has not until now been affected by the scholarly movement for the acknowledgment of the folklorism of the epic literature in the works of Menéndez Pidal, Rychner, Parry, Lord, Maugon, and others, which throw new light on Homer, the epos of the Latin peoples, and even Beowulf, by a comparision of the style of these monuments with that of epic songs existing in oral form, for example, among the Serbian guslars. 'Anti-folklorism' and positivistic modernism in general in contemporary works on the Edda, which comprise the extreme manifestation of a constantly deepening reaction against the naive Romantism of the first investigators of this monument, find support in a number of peculiarities of the Eddic lays. These are chiefly the unusual stylistic variety of the separate lays; the rather well-developed strophic formation, not typical for folklore; the weak and questionable traces of musical accompaniment; the rather restrained use of repetitions and parallelisms, and the strong development of synonymy, which as it were, runs contrary to the folkloric principles of "commonplaces".
These and other peculiarities
of Eddic poetry in many respects explain the extremes in contemporary
investigations without however justifying them. In some very important
points, Edda scholarship in the course of a hundred years has, so to speak,
arrived at completely opposite results, compared to that with which it
began. Rather than very old poetry preceding Contemporary scholarship, it seems to us, is faced with the task of reexamining some widespread conceptions of Eddic poetry with a view to recognizing its folkloric sources and genre-poetic archaic character and taking into account the most complex interlacing of oral and written. Common Germanic and Scandinavian, Eddic and skaldic traditions. In other words, it is a question of a kind of synthesis of the naive, but often basically quite reliable, views of nineteenth-century scholarship with the concrete achievements of the scholarship of the last hundred years, and with the contemporary methodology of philological and folkloric study. HOME | Articles Home | Top Of Page Images and Contents Copyright © Assembly of The Elder Troth 2002 - 2007 or as specified. For communications regarding this website please e-mail webmaster@aetaustralia.org Page maintained by Schmitt Services Last Update: Friday, February 9, 2007
|